Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
SpiritualismLink :: Welcome and General Topics :: The strange affair of the SNU and the dissenting tutors at the AFC
Page 42 of 43 • 1 ... 22 ... 41, 42, 43
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Jbodoski
Admin, Lis, Janhar and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
There's a shed load of money in the SNU piggy-bank anyway to pay costs and compo if any get awarded. It's small beer.
Then everything will quieten down and the ship will have its new course charted. Much of the old crew has been left on shore so the skipper will now push ahead as quickly as conditions allow using the new one.
There are some interesting times ahead.
mac
Admin, Lis, Janhar, OnlyVisitingEarth and Jbodoski like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Admin wrote:A subject well worth pursuing especially after High5's comments . One wonders what a psychologist may make of all the antics of the two major players JW and PJSlatewriter wrote:trueprogression46 wrote: All the tutors who are being persecuted are Empaths!
Your previous statement seems to show that you have some insider knowledge,
and your subsequent words seem to suggest that those persecuting the tutors are not empaths, but are in fact narcissists?
Would you agree with either of these assessments?
As a qualified Psychologist I can assure you both PJ and JW and Narcissists by their behavior pattern. Especially PJ referring thanks from "us" on a recent FB post in front of the late Gordon Higginson's photograph. Those members who voted in favour of the current President have got what they deserve as have those who didn't! Quote "The only thing necessary for evil to exist is that good men do nothing"
trueprogression46
Admin, Lis, notabigjump, Light-Nature-Truth, OnlyVisitingEarth, Jbodoski, MoMer and like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
I wouldn't know what to say in response to that, given this past several months' events.
mac
Admin, Lis, Janhar, notabigjump and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
trueprogression46 wrote:Admin wrote:A subject well worth pursuing especially after High5's comments . One wonders what a psychologist may make of all the antics of the two major players JW and PJSlatewriter wrote:trueprogression46 wrote: All the tutors who are being persecuted are Empaths!
Your previous statement seems to show that you have some insider knowledge,
and your subsequent words seem to suggest that those persecuting the tutors are not empaths, but are in fact narcissists?
Would you agree with either of these assessments?
As a qualified Psychologist I can assure you both PJ and JW and Narcissists by their behavior pattern. Especially PJ referring thanks from "us" on a recent FB post in front of the late Gordon Higginson's photograph. Those members who voted in favour of the current President have got what they deserve as have those who didn't! Quote "The only thing necessary for evil to exist is that good men do nothing"
I was very shocked to have seen that post. It does seem that way. I did actually ponder what a psychologist would think of all this too. Especially the PJ post. Could a picture of himself be any bigger, just the size of his head fills the screen compared to the modest picture of Gordon Higginson next to him. It looks like he mirrors himself to be the next GH. It's very creepy. It displays a total lack of awareness and the true depiction of a narcissist. The quote is very apt. Is there any good left at the helm of SNU now, or will evil triumph?
Light-Nature-Truth
Admin, Lis, notabigjump, OnlyVisitingEarth, unseenfriends and aurora like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
https://www.change.org/p/an-urgent-call-from-arthur-findlay-college-students-and-supporters
We all wonder why this situation is accepted by the board and the trust. Look at the list of very brave people, who have resigned or where thrown out of their position. I pray for them every day. This has to end. It does hurt so much.
aurora
Admin, Lis, Janhar, notabigjump, Light-Nature-Truth and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
A Directors conduct and indeed the conduct of a company is a matter that the Insolvency Service would investigate. The insolvency Service would also deal with that specific part of the Companies Act. If you have evidence of sharp practice and you feel there has been a deliberate intent to mislead, you may wish to consider contacting the Insolvency Service who may be able to investigate your concerns. Further information can be found at the below links;
Intelligence Hub
The Insolvency Service
4th floor, Cannon House
18 Priory Queensway
Birmingham
B4 6FD
Telephone: 0300 678 0017
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phoenix-companies-and-the-role-of-the-insolvency-service/phoenix-companies-and-the-role-of-the-insolvency-service#the-insolvency-services-role
Any allegations or suspicions of fraudulent behaviour should be reported to Action Fraud, the national fraud and cybercrime reporting centre for the Police. You can do this by visiting www.actionfraud.police.uk or phoning 0300 123 2040.
I am sorry that I am unable to help further at this point, but I hope that I have been able to explain our position and that the information given is of assistance.
So there is space, especially for members, to act. Should the acts be beyond the power of the President or company Officers (VP's and NEC members) then they will face all the risks we have suggested.
Someone mentioned could members be liable, no not for the NEC acts which are beyond their powers, in the very unlikely event the SNU went bankrupt the members liability is limited, by the guarantee, to 50p each.
More risky, given we have no true idea of the intentions of this President, is an attempt to gain control of the trusts and exercise them in the interests of a reduced membership. It is doable with the current lack of oversight in the Articles and Constitution.
We go back to the private message, very early in the piece, from a member who has never, I believe, posted on this topic, of JW wanting to take the SNU down the Scientology route (ah Spiritology a World of my Dreams).
Time for all members to be alert and any current NEC member who becomes concerned with the direction being taken to whistleblow urgently, if only to protect themselves. Unfortunately members are not required to be told of Bye Law changes until the NEC decides to do so, we saw that at this AGM. The one change, she really needed, got through then, with the passing of Electronic Voting, without that there was a breach of the Articles.
Admin- Admin
Lis, Janhar and High5 like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
The first Spiritualist church I went to happened to be a Christian Spiritualist church. I wasn’t bothered about the religious affiliation I just wanted to explore mediumship. It was a nice church with nice people who made me very welcome. Nevertheless there was much discord between these nice people and back stabbing. I could see both sides of their quarrels and did my best to mediate then left them to it for a while. I did go back and was just as warmly received. That was my first experience of the two faced nature of Spiritualism. The good face and the other one.
After a while I felt drawn to the local SNU church. At the time I was completely unaware that the SNU church was a religion. I thought it was Spiritualism for every one of any religion. When I started to hear anti Christian views there I was quite surprised. However, I was there for mediumship. They were again a nice group of people who nurtured me, developed me and gave me much friendship for many years. Also, they had disagreements, there was talking behind backs etc but by now I could just put this aside and enjoy the unity that endured despite the other things. These people were, and still are, my friends though I left them years ago. This was my second experience of the two faced nature of Spiritualism. The good face and the other one.
I left the SNU because I did not want to belong to any religion and I did not want belief in a set of Principles to be a requirement of my acceptance….even though I did, and still do, voluntarily share those beliefs as an independent medium. The AFC became my Spiritual home, as a non member, for many years. Meanwhile I continued to attend, and provide, services at both my old local SNU church and my old Christian Spiritualist Church until I decided I was not happy on platform and preferred to just work privately.
The AFC was a place where I was happiest, with mainly like minded people though I also encountered people there who were quite ruthless in their criticisms of other mediums. Some pretty nasty stuff got said.
Therefore, the AFC was my third experience, and ultimate realisation of the two faced nature of Spiritualism.
My life is now just my family and friends. I don’t work as a medium though of course it is still there. I find life without Spiritualism to be a kinder more tolerant life. I find less back biting between people in the shops, at social events and in my family than I ever saw in my years and years of Spiritualism.
Do I regret those Spiritualist years? Not one bit. It was a magical wonderful journey and I loved every bit of BOTH faces of Spiritualism, and both those faces are within ME.
Keep striving for the SNU and the AFC to be what you know it should be. Please don’t use the word evil. Nobody in this situation is evil. Those you are opposed to think differently to you and they want to control but they also are convinced they are right. Keep speaking your truth loudly and don’t let yourselves be silenced.
Janhar
Admin and High5 like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Thank you for sharing your experience and thoughts on Spiritualism.
I have been involved in the Spiritualist movement for 59 years (!) and like you I have seen much in that time that saddened me. I have met the nice people, and the ones who want you to think that they are nice but criticise and judge behind one's back. I have seen cruelty, injustice, deception, and, indeed, fraud and significant abuse of authority and power.
But I have also seen selfless commitment and dedication to Spiritualism, its churches and centres, and educational establishments. I have experienced kindness and unconditional acceptance as well as arbitrary and unjust rejection and abuse.
I began my journey as a Spiritualist and an emerging medium at the age of 17 at the Victorian Spiritualist Union, although I had attended an unaffiliated church in my local area prior to that. I have attended churches and centres in Australia, and in England. I worked as a platform medium when living in England at more than 20 churches on a regular basis, sometimes being the guest medium at three or even four meetings a week. I saw many good things, and some truly bad behaviours and attitudes.
I attended the AFC and other Spiritualist establishments in England, and learned much about my craft, which has proved invaluable over the years. Until returning to Australia and setting in South Australia I deliberately avoided becoming a member of any of those churches or centres, content to offer my services as a platform medium, but remain independent, and therefore able to largely remain a certain distance from the squabbles and conflicts I saw.
On moving to South Australia I did finally become a member of a centre, and later its voluntary leader, and I am still a committee member and a trustee of the association. Over the past thirty years I have again seen much of a similar nature as that observed in England. While it saddens me immensely, I have long realised that it is not Spiritualism that is, as you would describe it, "two-faced." Rather it is sadly a particular strand of people who are drawn to Spiritualism, and especially its psychic facet, who very often are seeking recognition, acknowledgement, and acceptance - aspects of life that they have felt they have missed out on. Unfortunately, that need, often becomes reflected in a desire for recognition and acceptance through achieving "power."
The consequences in any given Spiritualist church or centre, when such people gain positions of authority or power, can be devasting for many. It can cause disillusion and rejection of Spiritualism itself, because in the minds of those who have been on the receiving end of unkindness or abuse of power equate that treatment with Spiritualism.
But it is not Spiritualism as a belief system, as a set of values and guidelines for behaviour as a spiritual being having a physical life that is to blame, other than, perhaps, Spiritualism's failure to effectively educate its adherents of the spiritual principles by which we ought to strive to live.
While in one respect I would acknowledge I have seen more cruelty and lack of spirituality within my time as a Spiritualist, than I have ever seen in other areas of my life, I would also say that in many respects that is in part because my interactions with other facets of life has been less intensive and in-depth than my involvement with Spiritualism.
In reality, there are good people and unkind people "in the shops, at social events" and even, on occasion, in one's family. But, what that really should be telling us is that we are all on a journey through life, making good decisions, sometimes bad ones, being good people, and sometimes not, being unselfish, but sometimes self-centered, etc. In other words, we are all very human, very imperfect, and may on occasions be far less than we should be, or could be or ought to be. What Spiritualism teaches us, if we care to really look deeply into its philosophy, if we look past, the mediumship, and the psychism, is that there is a better way to behave, towards others, and ourselves. How we behave matters, and it is important to strive to overcome one's lesser qualities, not only for other people's sakes but for our own spiritual progression.
In the meantime, I agree with you, that we need to understand that those who, from our perspective are doing wrong, causing harm, giving rise to unhappiness and grief, do so because they think differently, and want to control because they are convinced that they are right. That perception is, from my perspective an error. Their actions are apparently more motivated by a desire/need for power and self aggrandizement than to achieve a better future for the SNU, the AFC, or Spiritualism itself.
But, even so, while we may desire to continue to fight against what we see as injustice, it is important to do so with love and compassion for those who we feel are behaving badly. For otherwise, we are no different than them.
Lis- Admin
Admin, Janhar, notabigjump and High5 like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Yes, my point has always been that everything, everyone, certainly religion has more than one face. So, I COULD describe it as “The two faced nature of All”. The reason I call it out specifically with Spiritualism (and all religion) is because, for me, there lies the greatest hypocrisy. Also, two faced does not necessarily mean a bad side. I used the term (other) rather than bad with great care. You can hide parts of yourself, (even from yourself) that are difficult to acknowledge but are not bad. For instance, a shy person might have potential to lead the world but be too afraid. A leader can long for obscurity and non recognition.Lis wrote:Hi Janhar,
In reality, there are good people and unkind people "in the shops, at social events" and even, on occasion, in one's family. But, what that really should be telling us is that we are all on a journey through life, making good decisions, sometimes bad ones, being good people, and sometimes not, being unselfish, but sometimes self-centered, etc. In other words, we are all very human, very imperfect, and may on occasions be far less than we should be, or could be or ought to be. What Spiritualism teaches us, if we care to really look deeply into its philosophy, if we look past, the mediumship, and the psychism, is that there is a better way to behave, towards others, and ourselves. How we behave matters, and it is important to strive to overcome one's lesser qualities, not only for other people's sakes but for our own spiritual progression.
In the meantime, I agree with you, that we need to understand that those who, from our perspective are doing wrong, causing harm, giving rise to unhappiness and grief, do so because they think differently, and want to control because they are convinced that they are right. That perception is, from my perspective an error. Their actions are apparently more motivated by a desire/need for power and self aggrandizement than to achieve a better future for the SNU, the AFC, or Spiritualism itself.
But, even so, while we may desire to continue to fight against what we see as injustice, it is important to do so with love and compassion for those who we feel are behaving badly. For otherwise, we are no different than them.
For me the religion is the people, the ideals are the people, so when I say the two faced nature of anything at all it means the people. I also think of humanity, “people” as a collective. Everything is a “we” for me and I need to remember that not everyone shares that view and I thank you for your input. Keep up your good work.
Janhar
High5 likes this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
mac
Janhar and notabigjump like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
I'm reminded that the official tutor dispute has been ongoing for 8 months now. Clearly, things were not right for a long time before this, but from exhausting all avenues and formally requesting action to resolve the dispute, we are 8 months on.
It's a long time to be hurting and plenty of time for a multi million pound company to have found solutions.
At the heart of this dispute are over 20 tutors who's courses are withdrawn for the foreseeable, students, the staff, other tutors SNU and the NEC. However, the galvanising factor for action is entrenched with deep disagreements about the behaviour of the current president and her closest associates.
I've watched the power grabs since the recent AGM and the unfair treatment of good hardworking people, dealt cruelly and removed from work they loved. I've also observed tutors who walked away from regular work at the college years ago, vowing it was too low paid for them, mysteriously reappear and start running courses again. Perhaps the possible return of the lucrative concession weeks, will enlighten us here.
I'm also horrified that given there is a tutor dispute the current president hasn't stepped aside from either teaching at the college or the NEC. There are so many things that do not sit right with me and many others, but one thing that has come to light, has been the significant number of non teaching staff who have either left or been removed from their positions.
It is easy to blame the tutor dispute on a dodgy contract or clash of personalities at the college - but there is so much more to this and the dispute is one aspect of it (a major aspect but there is always more).
With this all in mind, we need to be asking some serious questions around the behaviour and rhetoric of the president. She is very good at saying what she promises, but one of those promises that under her presidency, not one church would be closed or sold! Yet there are at least three SNU churches up for sale at the moment (Hounslow, Darlington & Sheffield). Two are on Rightmove right now! How is she going to explain this to the members?
Of further concern are the staffing levels at SNU HQ. We knew from the roll call that the General Manager Rachel Loukes, was leaving. She has now been removed from the SNU website. Yet, after all her years of work, not a single word on either their website or social media! Perhaps she requested this but I find it hard to imagine that her contributions have not been acknowledged with at least a thankyou. We will see now if one is forthcoming.
Shockingly, the HR expert Rachel Shannon's name is now not listed on the SNU website either.
In the fullness of time we will know more but there are so many issues around the dispute, the SNU, the promises made by the president about sale of churches and the revolving door staff, that it beggars belief.
Alongside all of this are several unresolved legal cases. Hmmmm
When the President kept stating 'churches first' did members believe she intended to protect them?
notabigjump
Admin, Lis, Janhar, OnlyVisitingEarth and unseenfriends like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
But on a different tack, when I first found myself 'in the spooks' I clearly remember often hearing that big change was about to happen. Understandably I expected it was to do with the so-called afterlife and related spiritual matters. But maybe what sensitives were picking up - but being unable to identify - was the beginning of a global energy shift about to affect the whole of our world.
Maybe what's happening 'in the spooks' is just one of the many, widespread changes?
mac
Admin, Janhar and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
notabigjump wrote: the significant number of non teaching staff who have either left or been removed from their positions.
Things have been quiet here for a while, but the wheels are surely still turning.
On your point above, notabigjump, aside from those in Admin/HR departments, do you know of any staff losses in other areas of the college?
For example hospitality, catering, reception, cleaning, maintenance?
Slatewriter
notabigjump likes this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Slatewriter wrote:notabigjump wrote: the significant number of non teaching staff who have either left or been removed from their positions.
Things have been quiet here for a while, but the wheels are surely still turning.
On your point above, notabigjump, aside from those in Admin/HR departments, do you know of any staff losses in other areas of the college?
For example hospitality, catering, reception, cleaning, maintenance?
I'd heard about Will the Head Groundsmen and Kelly in AFC accounts. I had also heard Dave the cleaner went but I don't know if it was during the current president. As for others I just wouldn't know.
notabigjump
Lis and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
This one must be almost as valuable as Hounslow, here are the pictures and Facebook comments
Last edited by Admin on Thu Oct 31, 2024 2:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Admin- Admin
notabigjump likes this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Sheffield
Darlington I wish I could remember why this was a famous place once.
Hounslow
Well maybe the first ones of the big sale I predicted on the way to Spirittology
Nice about 1.8 mill pounds to the trust fund.
These have to be in addition to the 3 that were announced as closed last year in this years AGM notes So 7 Gone in 15 months.
Not small places these so maybe a new cheaper place will be found or they will arise again as independents with their old community but no premises of their own.
Thanks for the heads up on those three notabigjump." />
Last edited by Admin on Thu Oct 31, 2024 2:13 am; edited 2 times in total
Admin- Admin
notabigjump and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
notabigjump wrote:Hi Mac and everyone. It has been a quiet week but I can only imagine there must be a stalemate in the next steps or pause for advice. I don't know but it appears possible.
I'm reminded that the official tutor dispute has been ongoing for 8 months now. Clearly, things were not right for a long time before this, but from exhausting all avenues and formally requesting action to resolve the dispute, we are 8 months on.
It's a long time to be hurting and plenty of time for a multi million pound company to have found solutions.
Shockingly, the HR expert Rachel Shannon's name is now not listed on the SNU website either.
In the fullness of time we will know more but there are so many issues around the dispute, the SNU, the promises made by the president about sale of churches and the revolving door staff, that it beggars belief.
Alongside all of this are several unresolved legal cases. Hmmmm
When the President kept stating 'churches first' did members believe she intended to protect them?
Was not it this HR expert, the one the President employed and praised highly, especially about creating a new complaints system fit for the purpose, who seems to have disappeared. After she got rid of the complaints committee that would not do what she wanted and found in favour of the tutors instead. Hmm Well she did, apparently, create the new tutor's contracts. However, that document was so unprofessionally written it looks more like a committee were involved mutually changing what should have been a simple, agreeable document into a Frankenstein's monster of a thing.
Lots to ponder about all this , if the HR expert has left they better have got the process right, HR experts tend to have excellent employment knowledge when they have freedom of action (you must ponder on how free she was to act)
Admin- Admin
Lis, notabigjump and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
"Statement regarding the future of the Barbanell Centre - Friday 1st November 2024...
Over the course of the past few years the SNU have engaged extensively with the staff and team at the Barbanell Centre in efforts to revitalise the centre and deal with the difficult headwinds and challenges they have been facing. The Centre has been a vital part of the Union for the past decade, providing an accessible space for learning, education and development, a venue for Union officials to meet, as well as providing the home for Stafford Spiritualist Church.
Regrettably, it has become apparent that the scope of the challenge and difficulties facing the Centre are not sustainable or surmountable in the long term. The running costs of the site are significant and the building itself is in need of extensive investment and rejuvenation in the coming years. Sadly, despite sterling efforts by all involved, the Centre is not able to meet even its running costs, let alone further investment and works.
It was therefore felt that the time had to come to accept that closure was unavoidable. The Board has therefore taken the very difficult decision to cease operations at the Barbanell Centre.
It was felt only appropriate to wait until after the Annual General Meeting in September before making any such decision or announcement, owing to a potential change of the Board. It would not have been appropriate for any outgoing Trustees to take such a decision and announce it as such, when an incoming Board may have opted to take a different approach.
We are also acutely aware of Stafford Spiritualist Church’s upcoming anniversary celebrations, and would ideally liked to have not taken this decision at this stage. However, we fully appreciate that the timing of any such announcement regarding the Centre was always going to be difficult, irrespective of when it was made.
It was additionally felt that delaying any announcement until the New Year would be unfair to both the staff and those expecting to attend courses during 2025.
The Board would like to reassure members that Stafford Church will continue to operate from its home at the Centre until such time as the site is sold. The Union, through Property Manager Andy Foley, is working closely with the members to find them a new home. The Union is committed to ensuring that the church remains a vibrant and welcoming place, and will do all that it can to safeguard its future.
It has been agreed that existing courses will proceed as scheduled until the end of 2024. You do not need to do anything if you are booked to attend any of the 2024 programme.
The course programme for 2025 is currently under review, and further details will follow shortly regarding this. We would like to ask that all involved show patience and respect for the staff who are also affected by this announcement and will be working during a particularly challenging time for them.
Students who are already embarked on Education and Exponents Committee courses will be able to complete their chosen course and shall be contacted by the committee regarding these. EEComm shall continue to offer courses in 2025, and these will be confirmed shortly.
It is appreciated that there will likely be many questions relating to this announcement and the closure of the Barbanell Centre, and we will endeavour to keep members as updated and informed as possible. Again, we kindly ask for patience and understanding as we all work through what is a difficult time, particularly for those at the Centre.
This decision has not been taken lightly, and has been actioned responsibly in light of the facts, finances and logistics. It is always a sad occasion to have to close a door or turn a page on a chapter in our Union’s long, proud history, but we give thanks to everyone who has helped make the Centre an inviting and exciting home for SNU Spiritualism over the past decade."
notabigjump
Admin likes this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Here is a roll call of honour of the growing list of people and roles who are believed to have resigned or had to withdraw their services or awards, since Jackie Wright became President. The list is growing and amongst some, are employment tribunals which are either ongoing or have been won in the complainants favour. I have removed surnames :
20 AFC Tutors plus Minister Matthew (withdrawn services)
Members and Staff resigned or pushed from committees, voluntary roles, or paid employment:
Christine
Alv
Ann
Danny
Pat
Jane
Anne-Marie
Adam
Richard
Rachel (SNU)
Julia (Resigned as elected Vice President)
Alessandro (AFC )
Dean (AFC)
Tanya AFC (AFC)
Kelly (AFC )
Will (AFC)
Minister Libby
Keith
Graham
Simone (SNUI)
Colin
Current Legal Proceedings Against The SNU
Employment Tribunals x 2
Civil Proceedings x 1
SNU Centres and Churches For Sale
The Barbanell Centre
Walthamstow
Hounslow (Under offer)
Sheffield
Darlington
notabigjump
Admin likes this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
What I find very interesting, however, is the fact that Jacky allowed Simon and Brian to stay at the center for a few months, as Brian was not allowed to fly due to a foot injury. Let's just hope that there is an invoice that shows that the two have paid for their accommodation properly. I heard something else.
aurora
Admin and Lis like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
aurora wrote: What I find very interesting, however, is the fact that Jacky allowed Simon and Brian to stay at the center for a few months, as Brian was not allowed to fly due to a foot injury. Let's just hope that there is an invoice that shows that the two have paid for their accommodation properly. I heard something else.
What was the something else you heard?
Slatewriter
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
Slatewriter wrote:aurora wrote: What I find very interesting, however, is the fact that Jacky allowed Simon and Brian to stay at the center for a few months, as Brian was not allowed to fly due to a foot injury. Let's just hope that there is an invoice that shows that the two have paid for their accommodation properly. I heard something else.
What was the something else you heard?
I'm still wracking my brains what sort of foot injury prevents flying for months?
notabigjump
Admin and Slatewriter like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
They kept all the bad news for after the election and the AGM. They knew all this before and kept it from the members for propaganda purposes. She cheated the members out of their say. Just burying bad news until it has to surface.
I wouldn't be surprised if the public posting about the churches for sale, has hastened this announcement, before it was 'accidentally' spotted for sale online.
Now I hope they redeem themselves by doing the right thing by the 20 tutors and getting the AFC back to being the spiritual home of so many and being profitable. The clock is ticking.
notabigjump
Admin, Lis, Slatewriter and OnlyVisitingEarth like this post
Re: Why is there a Clash between the Tutors and the AFC
They kept all the bad news for after the election and the AGM. They knew all this before and kept it from the members for propaganda purposes. She cheated the members out of their say. Just burying bad news until it had to surface.
She fought that election on a ticket of claiming transparency and no church closures. She has let all those voters down and done so much damage.
If the Barabnell needs to close so be it, but don't manipulate the members, who may not have voted for the current president if they had known what a calamity she is for the SNU and good relations. The roll call says it all!
I wouldn't be surprised if the public posting about the churches for sale, has hastened this announcement, before it was 'accidentally' spotted for sale online.
Now I hope they redeem themselves by doing the right thing by the 20 tutors and getting the AFC back to being the spiritual home of so many and being profitable. The clock is ticking.
notabigjump
OnlyVisitingEarth and aurora like this post
Page 42 of 43 • 1 ... 22 ... 41, 42, 43
SpiritualismLink :: Welcome and General Topics :: The strange affair of the SNU and the dissenting tutors at the AFC