Locked Posts!

That`s a good way Jim of not having to answer the biased behavior of this blog site, by locking all the posts so no one can make comment or challenge you and Liz, and re-highlighting other posts that you want people to see!

So predictable! I would be more than happy to contact Jamie to post here, and you will find that his qualifications in Science are Boniface and he does actually work for the Australian Federal Government and he is domicile in your city actually.

You guys really dont like it when you are challenged, but yet you feel it acceptable to have your opinion!

Go ahead Jim, lock this one or delete it or ban me, the choice is yours whatever you do it clearly shows biased reporting of events on this blog site.

You have been flooding the forum with your posts rather than ban you I will slow the flow of discussion to the forum pace not to fit your need.

Clearly whilst I and others fit them in our busy life it seems you have settled in to bombard; morning, noon and night even after midnight. May I offer you the advice you gave us David, get yourself a life there is more to this world that the musings of David Thompson's life. Even the forum watchers have indicated, on another thread, its enough.

I do have other ways of dealing with matters but please decline from posting for some time.

quote "So! are you going to comment on my above post Jim? I see you both have commented on Mic`s posting so you would have seen mine, yet you make no comments about me asking you to start to publish ALL reports, or will you continue to censor and only publish what you deem as newsworthy? All I am asking is for fair unbiased reports of ALL events, of course if you continue to ignore my seeking of clarification of this issue, its just as good as admitting biased reporting, after all you have continually mentioned on your website that I dont answer questions, yet you do the same! That looks like doubt standards to me!"

Perhaps you should consider what I wrote earlier.    (quote)


"And this is not a blog website - you're mischief making. This website exists as a group of discussion forums. Members are free to express their thoughts but there's no obligation on the owners to accommodate one individual's personal wishes.

Perhaps you prefer(red) PM4U's well-known approach to debate?"    

Beware, too, of not looking like a frying pan calling the kettle black.

Thank you David you have mentioned PM4U. You are well aware that by now you would have been long ago thrown off that forum. We do not have to accommodate the David Thompson show on a forum For Modern Spiritualists of which you have said on here you are not. The forum rules are expressed as above the welcome flag. I am well aware that if we ban you you will scream bias to the heavens but you do and have done for ages. There is nothing you have brought to this forum, indeed we have given ample opportunities to discuss with you the issues that exist about you mediumship. They have all been refused because there is only one position you take, no debate.

You have also refused to reduce your torrent of posts flooding and disrupting the forum, despite pleasant requests.

In the words of that "great sage" Robin Foy adopting the approach to problems, without resort to removing your posts"Bye for now"

Thankyou Mac, we try, sometimes at personal cost energetically.

I think that all readers should see an earlier discussion with David that was much more pleasant and reasonable; where his views were heard freely and where the discrepancy on William was aired. This was a totally normal discussion with none of the type of messages that appeared in the recent threads.

David also acknowledged that he had been reading the Questions For David Thompson Thread. No worthwhile resolution was reached but it shows that claims of bias and refusal to comment are somewhat overstated in these threads. Oh and David's experimentation in Thermography he says commenced in early 2014.

https://www.spiritualismlink.com/t2206-david-thompson-personal-message