Spirit of Psychic news Trade mark

Intrestingley, I have just spoke to Intelectual property, regarding the oposition to my trade marks, and as I allready new there is no previous trade mark and there for no opposition grounds, however they have to follow any opposition through the prosess where the oponent gets chance to produce the earlyer trade mark, mean while when this prosess is going on the trade mark that the SNU have aplyed for will sale throught because I am so silly that I did not think of that.
OH you think so wrong again, because I have grounds that it will efect the trade mark registration of my earlyer trade mark, in which they themselves have opposed.
Mean while I have asked that there oposition that I have lodged be taken into acount of my opposition and that the opposition will only be raised if it will efect the outcome of the oposition raised by SNU.
I have been informed that this is the case, therefor protecting my company from the excess fees that an ongoing trade mark disput will intail.
The person who raises the opposition is lible for the costs of £1'500 to £3'000 a day, as SNU raised this against me without a registerd trade mark to back it up, I think that was very nice of them, as for Mr Heiwit would you like to tell us what LL B after your name stands for, because the law society have no idea, they do know what LL P stands for, maybe he can enliten us,
As he may be aware I met him at whales in march 2008 where he told me he was a Judge, the same day that he was there, like myself to take about the change in law afecting mediumship. Before the take took place Mr Heiwit said that the law had not gone through parliment yet, I chalenged that as I had a letter from BERR to say that it had and that it was comming into force in may 2008, he then went to get a copy of his letter from BERR to show me that he was right. On showing me his letter I had to point out to him that the law that we were concered about and there to talk about was the UCPD 2007 and not the UCPD 2005 which he had in his letter and that the 2005 was replaced by the 2007 which had been passed through parliment on October 2007 with the plan that it would come into force in April 2008. This was later changed till May 2008.
Now you have the picture, let me tell you about my plans and how they are going. About three years ago I started to plan to bring out a mind body and spirit newspaper or magazine, this magazine or paper chopped and changed as I went along. it is not a Spiritual media, it is a mind body and spirit media, giving spirit comunication, tarot readings psychic art, Angel comunication and astroliyg all that sort of thing, This is for people who find problems getting out, or going to a spiritual church or simular for other reasons, This I have spoke about in lot of places and even had it in public domain, I have never kept it any secret since I went about the Design right to my paper (the proper way to protect the actual name of the individual paper) not your company name.
The name of this paper (which has been protected for more than two years) is Public Spirited. as anyone who has ever built a company will find out you do not call any product by your company name. I will continue to fight for my rights and I will put the company on hold until this is sorted out, but I intend to claim for any damages or money loss that I will incur during that time,
This hole situation has made me look at Some Spiritualist groups in a new Light and I have to reavaliate how I feel about Spiritualism. One, but only one of the reasons that I chose that name when it came to the crunch was that I felt that some of the people who were involved in the old news paper would want to bring it out again some day, and that I have told anyone who I have spoken to that I would never stand in their way, But If I did not use this name then some group like the bad psychic or other anti Spiritualist groups could have easly picked it up by trade mark and used it to cause damage to Spiritual practices.
As I stand at this time my faith in Spiritual groups has been put to the test over the last few years, that I could not tell any of them there is a problem, I have been trying to poin this out to another group for the last three years and it seams to me that if you tell a group that they need to protect themselves then they just see you as a trouble maker. So I acted alone and I know that I would always be wrong no mater how I went about it. I will continue with my work that I do and I will say what I see in the hope that when my kids and grandchildren have to face things like this maybe then people will ask questions thather than raising court action to find that they have to face publicly that they had the tolal wrong end of the stick, and that. is a fact that can all be backed up by hard evedence.

Publiceye wrote:

As he may be aware I met him at whales in march 2008 where he told me he was a Judge, the same day that he was there, like myself to take about the change in law afecting mediumship.

Hewitt a judge? Don't make me laugh!

That is a very seriois mater if it is not true, has he come back with what LL B stands for, because the law society dont even know,
maybe it stands for legal licence barred, this still does not explain the fact to he led me to believe he was a lawyer in 2008,
The sad fact is I liked Graham when I met him, and so did my son, people are not perfect, I think that he just gets in over his head sometimes, no doupt I will come face to face with him over the next few months, then maybe I can ask him myself about Whales and the conversations that we had on the phone afterwards. we are Spiritual people and the work I do is to help people come to understand that health problems are just that, lets not make this personal or a slagging match. I am sure that when the people envolved see I was only protecting them, everyone will go on with what the were going to do before, I can get back to my papers and they can get back to there paper, Staff will get back to work, the kids I work with will get their project of the ground, and we will go on with calling each other all the names under the sun. Just because everone has to much pride to talk at the begining. I will continue with my projects , my mediumship and my Acting as allways, then one day I will find time to finnish one of my books. I will continue studding law and will be able to show that I have had practice in many difirent feilds of law,
I have some pictures taken in our centre that you may find very intresting, we have had these people apear without working with pysical, Last week we had a spriger spanual dog, and a gost of a little girl, she looked like a shadow but she was wearing clothes.
Most of our mediums are now atuned to see the spirit enegy and to feel it to, adn that is without trying pysical.
I am having an early night tonight as I have a long day tomorow, film at 6am then on to do sittings after. life is to short to be mad
I just thank my lucky stars that I would be strong enouth to ask, before jumping to defend, but hey thats not the Spiritual way.
by the way Public Spirited has been up on utube for the last year, and when I get on top of things then the rest will be put up,
anyone with an Idea that has not been coverd please let us know, as this is a paper where people can get all about them. we are still working on the meditation CD and would like some music that is not run of the mill.

Publiceye wrote:

That is a very seriois mater if it is not true, has he come back with what LL B stands for, because the law society dont even know,

LLB stands for Bachelor of Law.

LLB does indeed stand for Batchelor of Laws - in other words Mr Hewitt was simply providing his academic qualification by using LLB after his name. He is perfectly entitled to do so.

Having a law degree does not make you a lawyer though, for that there is further training and qualifications. Mr Hewitt clearly was a lawyer and had achieved those further qualifications but in having asked for his name to be removed from the list of practising lawyers he is not now in a position to make reference to that.

I must admit I am quite puzzled that according to publiceye, the Law Society should suggest that it does not know what LLB stands for! Very odd.

Lis
Dip Ed, CQSW, LLB (Hons)

(just to mention a few qualifications lol)

I am quite puzzled to because the law society said that they know what LL P is but not LL B.
I recived a letter in the mail yesterday, from intelectual property, regarding the oppositiion to my trade mark Psychic news.
I will just give the Quote that gives them it strate Quote:The Form TM7-Notice has been filed invalidly and cannot be accepted.

The case has already sparked some media intrest as I have never tried to use the Psychic news of the past's logo and as a trade mark is a company logo and not the actual product. As of yet I have not recived the thetend court action, from the SNU, but the letter that I have recived from SNU and the trade mark opposition are more that ampel to take the action that I need.
As I said at the start when I let you all know what was going on, no matter what you do in this movement, there will always be people want to put you down, or stop you, (just because they did not do it first).
sorry to these people because people need my permiosion to put me down and I am not giving them that permision. infact I am have great fun in the fact that I exposed underhand behavior and the fact that these people will find out in court that they are raising action of accusing me of using there trade mark, (the company logo) this I have never done. and I have every right to use the works in a new logo in fact I have legal documents with proof dating back three years that it is not even the name of my paper, or that my logo is not even simular to theirs. I can say from my heart that the repitation of SNU is not one I would want to be asociated with, because I think that the people ho run the commity have ...... (a blinkered view )that they would not see reality if it jumped up an bit them. they are known in my thought as people who want to contole people, and anyone that knows me personaly will know that I aim for the oppisit, to encourage people to be themselves and accept that it takes all types of people to make a happy world.
The groups can talk all they like, the simple fact is as from the 6th Septemper 2010 I own the company and the rights. but this comunication was just to let you all know that a group who were saying that they were finished with the newspaper were infact trying to trade mark it, so at least you all know what they are planning.
my work will have no bering on any logo that any group puport to have rights to. and this legal action will probably make a laughing sock of it all.